Page 11 of 14

Vikings

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:00 pm
by Sylfil

1. Probably he did not gather the entire army, because during the conversation between the king and Roland (or whatever his name was that mustachioed and bearded male) it turned out that the defense of Paris is ready for the eventual defeat of Rollo.

2. Nobody knew what happened to him. And since it is not known, Aslaug played the role of number uno.
Aslaug had Bjorn's full support - and who would have jumped? :-)

3. How were they supposed to find out? Send a ship? So everyone thought peace was there and everything was fine, so why bother with Egbert? Besides, they did not recover from the loss for Paris.

Vikings

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:43 pm
by Kaikki

Why not send? No visits for so many years? Did they not recover from the loss? Have you seen how Kattegat has grown?

Vikings

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 11:10 pm
by Dangerous

A very, very long and very, very dangerous road ... Send a visit to the ship? And what's next? Would they be risking the lives of the crew just to see what a handful of settlers on British soil are like? The more that, in line with the peace agreement with Egbert, "everything played and sang"? If I were a Viking, I wouldn't see the sense of it. These were not people of a modern kind ... Moreover, the "visitors" would have to come back for a very, very distant ...

Vikings

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 12:24 am
by Leriel

They want to bring it to those events that are already confirmed historically. Because those now grown sons of Ragnar are a team that will mess up a lot in England. It is the leaders of the so-called Great Gentile Army. While Ragnar in myths is probably a cluster of several characters, his sons are characters confirmed in English chronicles.
Romulus, nothing could have ended with a death between Rollo and Ragnar because the former is the founder of the Normans and the latter is known to die, from season one. According to the applications.

Vikings

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 12:59 am
by Onirke

So I was betting on Ragnar's non-canonical death more than Rollo's. :) And sticking to the version from the legends with Ragnar's death is somehow not very spectacular and not very worthy of the leading character. But we will see.

Vikings

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 12:59 am
by Poison Ivy

Romek, why would the presentation of the cavity with snakes be used in the first season?

Vikings

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 1:36 am
by Triss Merigold

Spellu, you needlessly assume that writers know where // orc is going.

Vikings

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 1:58 am
by Kaikki

I dreamed it might be some form of play, eye-winking, what Americans call teasing - teasing. But with season 4A you can probably stop dreaming or deluding yourself. :)

Vikings

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 1:58 am
by Pensmug

Probably not the target for such games :) York, because Chekhov's shotgun, biatch

Vikings

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:10 am
by Alfa

I recently finished reading the first part of Gemmell's "Trilogy", and there the author approached the Trojan War in a very non-canonical way - yet still sticking to the general framework of the conflict. And here is the legend and here the legend (although perhaps it is less of a legend with "Vikings") - but more fun when reading such a peculiar reinterpretation of the Trojan War than when clinging to scraps of a legend in a series about Vikings.